# Square Root in Verilog

The square root is useful in many circumstances, including statistics, graphics, and signal processing. In this how to, we’re going to look at a straightforward digit-by-digit square root algorithm for integer and fixed-point numbers. There are lower-latency methods, but this one is simple, using only subtraction and bit shifts. New to Verilog maths? Check out my introduction to Numbers in Verilog.

Share your thoughts with @WillFlux on Mastodon or Twitter. If you like what I do, sponsor me. 🙏

### Source

The SystemVerilog designs featured in this post are available from the Project F Library under the open-source MIT licence: build on them to your heart’s content. The rest of the blog content is subject to standard copyright restrictions: don’t republish it without permission.

## Getting Radical

The square root of a number is a second number that multiplied by itself produces the first number. If `b`

is the square root of `a`

, then the following are different ways of representing their relationship:

`b² = a`

`b = a`

^{1/2}`b = √a`

The square root is usually represented with the **radical sign** `√`

.

Let’s look at a few concrete examples:

`√4 = 2`

`√100 = 10`

`√2 ≈ 1.41421`

`√3 ≈ 1.73205`

Most square roots are irrational, so we only get an approximate answer algorithmically. However, the good news is that our method will provide an exact solution if one exists.

We’re only going to consider the positive root in this post, but there is also a negative root. For example, the square roots of `4`

are `+2`

*and* `-2`

.

## Triangles

Pythagoras’s theorem is a fundamental equation in geometry. For a right-angled triangle, the area of the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the areas of the squares on the other two sides.

`a² + b² = c²`

Finding `c`

is a common problem in computer graphics, which means solving `√(a² + b²)`

.

For 3D modelling, it’s common to need the reciprocal of `c`

.

*Diagram courtesy of Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike licence.*

## The Long Route

So far, so (probably) familiar. However, you’re unlikely to have calculated square roots by hand. Superficially, square roots seem too hard to do manually, but the approach is almost the same as long division. I won’t go into the mathematics here, but Wikipedia has a decent write up: methods of computing square roots. Instead, we’ll take a simple example, then turn it into a Verilog algorithm.

### Example: √1111001

The number we’re finding the root of is known as the **radicand**.

For our example, the radicand is `1111001`

(121 in decimal).

Our algorithm works with pairs of digits. Before we begin our calculation, we need to split the radicand into pairs starting with the least significant. Thus `1111001`

becomes `01 11 10 01`

.

```
1 0 1 1 Our answer: one digit for each pair of digits in the radicand
———————————
√01 11 10 01 Our radicand
01 Bring down the most significant pair
- 01 Subtract 01
——
00 Our answer is NOT negative, so our first answer digit is 1
00 11 Bring down the next pair of digits and append to previous result
- 01 01 Append 01 to our existing answer, 1, and subtract it
—————
11 00 Our result is negative, so our second answer digit is 0
We discard the result because it's negative
00 11 10 Keep the existing digits, 00 11, and append the next pair
- 10 01 Append 01 to our existing answer, 10, and subtract it
————————
01 01 Our answer is NOT negative, so our next answer digit is 1
01 01 01 Bring down the next pair of digits and append to previous result
- 01 01 01 Append 01 to our existing answer, 101, and subtract it
————————
00 Our answer is NOT negative, so our next answer digit is 1
```

There are no more pairs of digits, and the result of our last step is 0, so our answer is exact:

`√1111001 = 1011`

or in decimal `√121 = 11`

.

We’ll look at what happens for irrational roots, such as √2, when we come to fixed-point numbers.

## Algorithm Implementation

To make our algorithm usable on an FPGA, we need to turn the steps into simple operations we can represent in Verilog. The main change is using shifts to select numbers to work on. We’ll use four registers in our algorithm:

**X**- input radicand we want the square root of**A**- holds the current value we’re working on**T**- result of sign test**Q**- the square root

```
Input: X=01111001 (decimal 121)
Step A X T Q Description
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
00000000 01111001 00000000 0000 Starting values.
1 00000001 11100100 Left shift X by two places into A.
00000000 Set T = A - {Q,01}: 01 - 01.
0000 Left shift Q.
00000000 0001 Is T≥0? Yes. Set A=T and Q[0]=1.
2 00000011 10010000 Left shift X by two places into A.
11111100 Set T = A - {Q,01}: 11 - 101.
0010 Left shift Q.
Is T≥0? No. Move to next step.
3 00001110 01000000 Left shift X by two places into A.
00000101 Set T = A - {Q,01}: 1110 - 1001
0100 Left shift Q.
00000101 0101 Is T≥0? Yes. Set A=T and Q[0]=1.
4 00010101 00000000 Left shift X by two places into A.
00000000 Set T = A - {Q,01}: 10101 - 10101.
1010 Left shift Q.
00000000 1011 Is T≥0? Yes. Set A=T and Q[0]=1.
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Output: Q=1010 (decimal 11), R=0 (remainder taken from final A).
```

## Verilog Module

Our Verilog design uses the above algorithm, but you can configure the width of the radicand. `WIDTH`

must be a multiple of two, for example, when working with seven binary digits, you must set the width to eight.

Project F Library source: **[sqrt_int.sv]**.

```
module sqrt_int #(parameter WIDTH=8) ( // width of radicand
input wire logic clk,
input wire logic start, // start signal
output logic busy, // calculation in progress
output logic valid, // root and rem are valid
input wire logic [WIDTH-1:0] rad, // radicand
output logic [WIDTH-1:0] root, // root
output logic [WIDTH-1:0] rem // remainder
);
logic [WIDTH-1:0] x, x_next; // radicand copy
logic [WIDTH-1:0] q, q_next; // intermediate root (quotient)
logic [WIDTH+1:0] ac, ac_next; // accumulator (2 bits wider)
logic [WIDTH+1:0] test_res; // sign test result (2 bits wider)
localparam ITER = WIDTH >> 1; // iterations are half radicand width
logic [$clog2(ITER)-1:0] i; // iteration counter
always_comb begin
test_res = ac - {q, 2'b01};
if (test_res[WIDTH+1] == 0) begin // test_res ≥0? (check MSB)
{ac_next, x_next} = {test_res[WIDTH-1:0], x, 2'b0};
q_next = {q[WIDTH-2:0], 1'b1};
end else begin
{ac_next, x_next} = {ac[WIDTH-1:0], x, 2'b0};
q_next = q << 1;
end
end
always_ff @(posedge clk) begin
if (start) begin
busy <= 1;
valid <= 0;
i <= 0;
q <= 0;
{ac, x} <= {{WIDTH{1'b0}}, rad, 2'b0};
end else if (busy) begin
if (i == ITER-1) begin // we're done
busy <= 0;
valid <= 1;
root <= q_next;
rem <= ac_next[WIDTH+1:2]; // undo final shift
end else begin // next iteration
i <= i + 1;
x <= x_next;
ac <= ac_next;
q <= q_next;
end
end
end
endmodule
```

To use the module, set `WIDTH`

to the correct number of bits and input `rad`

to the radicand. To begin the calculation set `start`

high for one clock. The `valid`

signal indicates when the output data is valid; you can then read the results from `root`

and `rem`

. The calculation takes one cycle for each pair of bits in the radicand, so a 16-bit radicand would take eight cycles. The `busy`

signal is high during calculation.

The Verilog itself is straightforward. The algorithm is in the `always_comb`

block, though we start with the initial shift already in place. The `always_ff`

block sets up the initial values, then runs the algorithm for the number of digits in the root.

### Testing

The following Vivado test bench exercises the module. A Verilator test bench will be added in due course.

Project F Library source: **[xc7/sqrt_int_tb.sv]**.

```
module sqrt_int_tb();
parameter CLK_PERIOD = 10;
parameter WIDTH = 8;
logic clk;
logic start; // start signal
logic busy; // calculation in progress
logic valid; // root and rem are valid
logic [WIDTH-1:0] rad; // radicand
logic [WIDTH-1:0] root; // root
logic [WIDTH-1:0] rem; // remainder
sqrt_int #(.WIDTH(WIDTH)) sqrt_inst (.*);
always #(CLK_PERIOD / 2) clk = ~clk;
initial begin
$monitor("\t%d:\tsqrt(%d) =%d (rem =%d) (V=%b)", $time, rad, root, rem, valid);
end
initial begin
clk = 1;
#100 rad = 8'b00000000; // 0
start = 1;
#10 start = 0;
#50 rad = 8'b00000001; // 1
start = 1;
#10 start = 0;
#50 rad = 8'b01111001; // 121
start = 1;
#10 start = 0;
#50 rad = 8'b01010001; // 81
start = 1;
#10 start = 0;
#50 rad = 8'b01011010; // 90
start = 1;
#10 start = 0;
#50 rad = 8'b11111111; // 255
start = 1;
#10 start = 0;
#50 $finish;
end
endmodule
```

The output looks like this (`V=1`

indicates the result is valid):

```
0: sqrt( x) = x (rem = x) (V=x)
100: sqrt( 0) = x (rem = x) (V=0)
140: sqrt( 0) = 0 (rem = 0) (V=1)
160: sqrt( 1) = 0 (rem = 0) (V=0)
200: sqrt( 1) = 1 (rem = 0) (V=1)
220: sqrt(121) = 1 (rem = 0) (V=0)
260: sqrt(121) = 11 (rem = 0) (V=1)
280: sqrt( 81) = 11 (rem = 0) (V=0)
320: sqrt( 81) = 9 (rem = 0) (V=1)
340: sqrt( 90) = 9 (rem = 0) (V=0)
380: sqrt( 90) = 9 (rem = 9) (V=1)
400: sqrt(255) = 9 (rem = 9) (V=0)
440: sqrt(255) = 15 (rem = 30) (V=1)
```

## Fixed-Point Roots

In a previous recipe, we looked at Fixed Point Numbers in Verilog. It turns out that supporting fixed-point square roots is straightforward: we just run more iterations to account for the fractional digits. Unlike with division, there’s no possibility of overflow, as the root of a radicand greater than 1 is always smaller than the radicand itself.

This new version of the sqrt module adds a parameter `FBITS`

for the number of fractional bits in the radicand (`FBITS`

must be a multiple of two). For example, if we want to calculate √2 using Q8.8 format (eight integer and eight fractional bits), we set `WIDTH=16`

and `FBITS=8`

. The only change within the module is for `ITER`

, which now accounts for fractional bits. For a Q8.8 radicand, we now perform `(16+8)/2 = 12`

iterations, generating four more bits for the root.

Project F Library source: **[sqrt.sv]**.

```
module sqrt #(
parameter WIDTH=8, // width of radicand
parameter FBITS=0 // fractional bits (for fixed point)
) (
input wire logic clk,
input wire logic start, // start signal
output logic busy, // calculation in progress
output logic valid, // root and rem are valid
input wire logic [WIDTH-1:0] rad, // radicand
output logic [WIDTH-1:0] root, // root
output logic [WIDTH-1:0] rem // remainder
);
logic [WIDTH-1:0] x, x_next; // radicand copy
logic [WIDTH-1:0] q, q_next; // intermediate root (quotient)
logic [WIDTH+1:0] ac, ac_next; // accumulator (2 bits wider)
logic [WIDTH+1:0] test_res; // sign test result (2 bits wider)
localparam ITER = (WIDTH+FBITS) >> 1; // iterations are half radicand+fbits width
logic [$clog2(ITER)-1:0] i; // iteration counter
always_comb begin
test_res = ac - {q, 2'b01};
if (test_res[WIDTH+1] == 0) begin // test_res ≥0? (check MSB)
{ac_next, x_next} = {test_res[WIDTH-1:0], x, 2'b0};
q_next = {q[WIDTH-2:0], 1'b1};
end else begin
{ac_next, x_next} = {ac[WIDTH-1:0], x, 2'b0};
q_next = q << 1;
end
end
always_ff @(posedge clk) begin
if (start) begin
busy <= 1;
valid <= 0;
i <= 0;
q <= 0;
{ac, x} <= {{WIDTH{1'b0}}, rad, 2'b0};
end else if (busy) begin
if (i == ITER-1) begin // we're done
busy <= 0;
valid <= 1;
root <= q_next;
rem <= ac_next[WIDTH+1:2]; // undo final shift
end else begin // next iteration
i <= i + 1;
x <= x_next;
ac <= ac_next;
q <= q_next;
end
end
end
endmodule
```

And we can create a simple Vivado test bench for it.

Project F Library source: **[xc7/sqrt_tb.sv]**.

```
module sqrt_tb();
parameter CLK_PERIOD = 10;
parameter WIDTH = 16;
parameter FBITS = 8;
parameter SF = 2.0**-8.0; // Q8.8 scaling factor is 2^-8
logic clk;
logic start; // start signal
logic busy; // calculation in progress
logic valid; // root and rem are valid
logic [WIDTH-1:0] rad; // radicand
logic [WIDTH-1:0] root; // root
logic [WIDTH-1:0] rem; // remainder
sqrt #(.WIDTH(WIDTH), .FBITS(FBITS)) sqrt_inst (.*);
always #(CLK_PERIOD / 2) clk = ~clk;
initial begin
$monitor("\t%d:\tsqrt(%f) = %b (%f) (rem = %b) (V=%b)",
$time, $itor(rad*SF), root, $itor(root*SF), rem, valid);
end
initial begin
clk = 1;
#100 rad = 16'b1110_1000_1001_0000; // 232.56250000
start = 1;
#10 start = 0;
#120 rad = 16'b0000_0000_0100_0000; // 0.25
start = 1;
#10 start = 0;
#120 rad = 16'b0000_0010_0000_0000; // 2.0
start = 1;
#10 start = 0;
#120 $finish;
end
endmodule
```

*NB. I have tested with a wide range of roots, but only show a few here to keep the example managable.*

The output looks like this (`V=1`

indicates the result is valid):

```
0: sqrt(0.000000) = xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (0.000000) (rem = xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (V=x)
100: sqrt(232.562500) = xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (0.000000) (rem = xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (V=0)
220: sqrt(232.562500) = 0000111101000000 (15.250000) (rem = 0000000000000000) (V=1)
230: sqrt(0.250000) = 0000111101000000 (15.250000) (rem = 0000000000000000) (V=0)
350: sqrt(0.250000) = 0000000010000000 (0.500000) (rem = 0000000000000000) (V=1)
360: sqrt(2.000000) = 0000000010000000 (0.500000) (rem = 0000000000000000) (V=0)
480: sqrt(2.000000) = 0000000101101010 (1.414062) (rem = 0000000000011100) (V=1)
```

`1.01101010`

is the correct result for `√2`

using eight fractional bits. Wolfram Alpha provides a quick way to check binary square roots, for example: √2 to base 2.

The smallest value the Q8.8 format can represent is 1/256 or ~0.004 in decimal; if you want a more accurate result, you need to use more fractional bits.

## What’s Next?

That wraps up this FPGA recipe, but you might like to check out Division in Verilog or Sine & Cosine.